#Mac open in terminal how to#
#Mac open in terminal code#

Open the selected in X (e.g., Github Desktop) Open X (e.g., folders or files) in Terminal or Editor

#Mac open in terminal how to#

process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec('sh -c ls. ) does NOT behave the same as a Shell command line interpreter. The > is a special symbol understood only by Shell command line interpreter. ) does not understand the > symbol at all. The above single line script does not consume the stream, therefore the content of the stream is eventually thrown away. The output stream from the subprocess is implicitly redirected to the parent process (the Test Case in Katalon Studio). When Runtime.getRuntime().exec('sh -c ls. I wrote a Test Case of single line: process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec('sh -c ls. Thereby the parent process can use these streams to feed input to and get output from the subprocess.Ĭonsequently, this gives us a huge amount of flexibility as it gives us control over the input/output of our redirection operator > does not work in a Java/Groovy program. All its standard I/O (i.e., stdin, stdout, stderr) operations will be sent to the parent process. Quoting from this article:īy default, the created subprocess does not have its terminal or console.

#Mac open in terminal code#

This code will work just the same on Mac, Linux and Windows. I do not need to open a window of “Terminal.app” at all. Here you can see the output from the subprocess (the shell script) is consumed by the parent process (Test Case). When I ran TC1, I saw the following output in the Console of Katalon Studio GUI: 09:20:02.850 DEBUG testcase.TC1 - 8: out.println('stderr: ' + errString) New InputStreamReader(process.getInputStream())) New InputStreamReader(process.getErrorStream())) Process process = new ProcessBuilder('sh', shellFile.toString()).start() Path shellFile = projectDir.resolve('Automation.sh') Path projectDir = Paths.get(System.getProperty('user.dir')) I made a Test Case script Test Cases/TC1: import # call this function to write into stderr In the Katalon Studio projects’ folder, I made a shell script /Automation.sh: #!/bin/sh LE: and of-course, all from above can be enforced to a specific shell terminal for a specific script through the use of a shebang but i will let you read more about this by using various searches …Įven if the terminal is opening or not, at least if it can display inside the console if the sh script is even executing. So, knowing your OS in depth may help you to avoid headache.īut yeah, 's comment are somehow valid … pay more attention when using code snippets found here and there … Most probably same it is on Mac, since it is also an *unix OS despite whatever fans may think. PATH=/home/ibus/.local/bin:/home/ibus/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/var/lib/snapd/snap/bin home/ibus/.local/bin:/home/ibus/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/var/lib/snapd/snap/bin It is an alias which can point to various executables (bash, zsh, csh and so on). $PATH it is just … a path where the OS may look for various executable’s (binaries) but not a binding for a specific one.īut, in the case of Linux at least, the sh binding it is not made in the $PATH, but in the environment in use, which may vary from user to user ($PATH is just a variable inside this guy). Please find that this sample executes sh command (possibily bash executable) which will be found in the $PATH environment variable of OS, so it will successfully run.Īlthough you are right, the exec() will speak to the OS (and not call terminal which is yet another app), when we speak about sh scripts we have to first talk about shells.